Cook County Judges

Send your comments to picepil@aol.com (see about for guidelines)

Posts Tagged ‘Title IV

Bias against men in family courts – “Don’t nigggerise me”

with 7 comments


Don’t niggerise me” (“nigger” = an offensive term used in Britain against Asians as well as Blacks – which the writer of the article containing this quote states is essentially what is happening to non-custodial parents, regardless of their race) was the plea of a British fellow regarding corruption in family courts – you will see below is how non-custodial parents are treated IN AMERICA today – reminding me of the status of Blacks in America a 100 years ago!

This corruption is pervasive in American family courts as well – but I believe this applies to women as much as men, regardless of their race, who end up wrongfully as the non-custodial parent instead of as a co-parent with loving relationship with their children – solely due to the corruption of our family courts which is destroying child/parent relationships and teaching our children only greed and materialism, while alienating parents from their children. [all quotes are for emphasis  purposes and are from Dr Linda Shelton written in this article]

I observed for several years now family court cases in Cook County, Illinois.  I find that the judges are abdicating their responsibility to make decisions to the ill-trained and grossly biased child representatives and guardians ad litem.  There is a strong bias towards assuming that one parent is BAD and one parent is GOOD and at all costs vilifying the parent these court-appointed attorneys decide is bad, usually with just hearsay and no actual evidence.

I have seen case after case where literally no evidence was allowed from one side to refute false statements from the other parent that were mere hearsay unsupported by evidence. The judges are therefore pulling  their custody decisions out of thin air on the advice of court-appointed attorneys masquerading as trained evaluators of family interactions (psychologist, psychiatrist, psychiatric social workers, etc).

The family court lawyers for both the parents charge outrageous fees and grossly ignore constitutional rights, as well as grossly ignore federal and state laws (750 ILCS 5/506) that were supposed to encourage joint parenting, mediation, and solving of family arguments so that children are raised in a loving and nurturing instead of hostile, stressful and disruptive environment – which also deplete family funds including their college funds. Many  parents last year testified to these facts in the Illinois House of Representatives. See their testimony here.

I believe that literally billions of dollars have been and are misappropriated in this scheme that is  producing millions of children that are being taught that parents are unimportant and only serve as deep pockets for their every wish.  This is destroying the families in America and encouraging greed, lawlessness, and immorality.

I firmly believe that the family courts and the lawyers and counselors that practice associated with them run a scheme to fill their pockets and pensions with the feuding families’ financial assets and money from the federal government that comes from Social Security Title IV-D and Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) funds. I believe the VAWA is faulty in failing to have oversight as to how the funds are used and in being grossly biased against men.  I therefore do NOT support it without safeguards changing it to prevent these abuses. I feel some sympathy with those that believe womens’ shelters increase this bias. I don’t endorse everything said in this link, but much of what is said in the POD1 report supports this corruption as being true and needs remedy.

Two of the alleged worst offenders in violating these state and federal laws are child representatives David Wessel, Mary T. Doheny, and Ralla Klepak, as well as former child representative and now Judge Regina Scannicchio. The worst offending judges who are ignoring the Bill of Rights, the State statutes, and any concern over the childrens’ relationships with both parents include Judge David Haracz, Judge Veronica Mathein (well  known  appearing to hate men), Judge Pamela Loza, Judge Grace Dickler, Judge Fe Fernandez, Judge Debra Walker, Judge Leida J. Santiago, and Judge Paul Vega.

The “POD1″ report from the Illinois House of Representatives Family Law Study Committee seems to support this contention that there is a scheme or what they call development of a “cottage industry” that is supported by misused funds that encourages enrichment of these attorneys instead of the best interests of the children.

The Bill of Rights is trashed in Cook County Domestic Division (family) courts.  Decisions are often made based on hearsay thrown around by these more often than not corrupt court-appointed attorneys. Child representatives totally ignore 750 ILCS 5/506(a)(3) statutes (reproduced at end of this post) that REQUIRE the child representative to act as the gatherer of discovery and present a pre-trial memorandum to both parents as to what are the “evidence-based legal argument” that he/she will present to the court through testimony of others and documents, which cause him/her to promote a specific custody decision.

Normally in civil cases discovery (factual information, proposed witness testimony, and evaluators reports, as well as child representative summaries of interviews with child(ren), teachers, friends, family, clergy, doctors that will be used in the divorce trial) is requested by each party and exchanged. The pre-trial memorandum is supposed to replace discovery to some extent and put the discovery in the hands of a supposedly neutral court-appointed attorney who is supposed to pay attention to the “best  interest of the child[ren]”. However, I have yet to see ANY child representative produce ANY statutory required  “pre-trial memorandum” and I have seen NO JUDGE REPRIMAND ANY child representative for failure to do so.  I have seen NO JUDGE POSTPONE a trial until the child representative produces a pre-trial memorandum and NO JUDGE HOLD a child representative in contempt of court FOR FAILURE TO FOLLOW THIS LAW!

As a result divorce trials proceed with hearsay and not discovery – often biased against one side as the other side has not been given legal notice of evidence of it prior to trial. There is no fairness or justice, just a railroading of the vilified parent turning them into a deep-pocket to be used by the other parent, while the vilified parent’s child/parent relationship is de facto severed.

I have seen as many woman as men vilified falsely in this manner totally denying their constitutional right to due process and in the end harming the children, rather than resulting in a decision that is in their best interest. The parent is often rendered penniless and many are now even homeless, due to the violation of the Federal Consumer Protection law that requires that wage garnishment in divorce cases can be more than 60% of a parent’s income.  Judges are routinely ordering parents to pay child support in excess of their income! See:

15 USC § 1671 et seq. Federal Wage Garnishment Law (Title III of the Consumer Protection Act) & corresponding 29 CFR Part 870

When the man is vilified, the bias and defamation is in many ways as bad as the bias against blacks in the South during segregation.  That is why this article:

Don’t niggerise me”

written by an Asian British man regarding what is happening in the UK is relevent all over the world when family courts show bias against men.

Please read it and then read my

letter to the Cook County Board of Commissioners

asking them to investigate the corruption and denial of constitutional rights in the family courts, as well as asking them to pressure the Illinois legislature to change the law so that the courts are forced to encourage instead of discourage equal parenting; discourage instead of encourage vilifying parents; encourage instead of discourage mediation and low-cost counseling instead of excessive appointment of unqualified attorneys who illegally act as psychologists and psychiatrists without a license.  The phone numbers and email addresses to the board members are written below.

PLEASE CONTACT THE BOARD MEMBERS AND ASK THEM TO INVESTIGATE THE ABOVE AND FORCE THE LEGISLATURE AND COUNTY COURTS TO STOP VIOLATING CONSTITUTIONAL AND CIVIL RIGHTS AND

STOP HARMING OUR CHILDREN! ENCOURAGE JOINT PARENTING AND MEDIATION! STOP  IMPOVERISHING FAMILIES TO ENRICH UNNECESSARY COURT-APPOINTED ATTORNEYS! LIMIT FEES FOR DIVORCE ATTORNEYS APPOINTED BY THE COURT TO NO MORE THAN $150/HR CAPPED AT $5,000 PER CASE.  SPECIFY IN COURT ORDERS THAT ONLY OPINIONS OF TRAINED EVALUATORS THAT HAVE INTERVIEWED FAMILY MEMBERS FROM BOTH SIDES, TEACHERS, FRIENDS AND DOCTORS CAN RENDER OPINIONS AS TO WHAT CUSTODY ARRANGEMENT IS BEST!

COOK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS:

Phone Number

President Toni Preckwinkle

312-603-6400

Robert Steele

312-603-3019

Larry Suffredin

312-603-6383

Earlean Collins

312-603-4566

Timothy O. Schneider

312-603-6388

Jerry Butler

312-603 6391

Elizabeth Doody Gorman

312-603-4215

Joan Patricia Murphy

312-603-4216

Jeffrey R. Tobolski

312-603-6384

Bridget Gainer

312-603-4210

John A. Fritchey

312-603-6380

William M. Beavers

312-603-2065

Gregg Goslin

312-603-4932

Edwin Reyes

312-603-6386

Jesus G. Garcia

312-603-5443

Deborah Sims

312-603 6381

Peter N. Silvestri

312-603-4393

John P. Daley

312-603-4400

Commissioner Email addresses:

r.steele@robertsteele.org

earlean.collins@cookcountyil.gov

jerry.butler@cookcountyil.gov

joan.murphy@cookcountyil.gov

commissioner@bridgetgainer.com

edwin.reyes@cookcountyil.gov

deborah.sims@cookcountyil.gov

john.daley@cookcountyil.gov

larry.suffredin@cookcountyil.gov

tim.schneider@cookcountyil.gov

liz@lizgorman.com

commish@fritchey.com

commissioner.goslin@cookcountyil.gov

Jesus.Garcia@cookcountyil.gov

cookcty9@aol.co

750 ILCS 5/506 Representation of child.

(a) Duties. In any proceedings involving the support, custody, visitation, education, parentage, property interest, or general welfare of a minor or dependent child, the court may, on its own motion or that of any party, appoint an attorney to serve in one of the following capacities to address the issues the court delineates:

(1) Attorney. The attorney shall provide           independent legal counsel for the child and shall owe the same duties of undivided loyalty, confidentiality, and competent representation as are due an adult client.

(2) Guardian ad litem. The guardian ad litem shall testify or submit a written report to the court regarding his or her recommendations in accordance with the best interest of the child. The report shall be made available to all parties. The guardian ad litem may be called as a witness for purposes of cross examination regarding the guardian ad litem’s report or recommendations. The guardian ad litem shall investigate the facts of the case and interview the child and the parties.

(3) Child representative. The child representative shall advocate what the child representative finds to be in the best interests of the child after reviewing the facts and circumstances of the case. The child representative shall meet with the child and the parties, investigate the facts of the case, and encourage settlement and the use of alternative forms of dispute resolution. The child representative shall have the same authority and obligation to participate in the litigation as does an attorney for a party and shall possess all the powers of investigation as does a guardian ad litem. The child representative shall consider, but not be bound by, the expressed wishes of the child. A child representative shall have received training in child advocacy or shall possess such experience as determined to be equivalent to such training by the chief judge of the circuit where the child representative has been appointed. The child representative shall not disclose confidential communications made by the child, except as required by law or by the Rules of Professional Conduct. The child representative shall not render an opinion, recommendation, or report to the court and shall not be called as a witness, but shall offer evidence based legal arguments. The child representative shall disclose the position as to what the child representative intends to advocate in a pre trial memorandum that shall be served upon all counsel of record prior to the trial. The position disclosed in the pre trial memorandum shall not be considered evidence. The court and the parties may consider the position of the child representative for purposes of a settlement conference.

(a 3) Additional appointments. During the proceedings the court may appoint an additional attorney to serve in the capacity described in subdivision (a)(1) or an additional attorney to serve in another of the capacities described in subdivision (a)(2) or (a)(3) on the court’s own motion or that of a party only for good cause shown and when the reasons for the additional appointment are set forth in specific findings.

(a 5) Appointment considerations. In deciding whether to make an appointment of an attorney for the minor child, a guardian ad litem, or a child representative, the court shall consider the nature and adequacy of the evidence to be presented by the parties and the availability of other methods of obtaining information, including social service organizations and evaluations by mental health professions, as well as resources for payment.

In no event is this Section intended to or designed to abrogate the decision making power of the trier of fact. Any appointment made under this Section is not intended to nor should it serve to place any appointed individual in the role of a surrogate judge.

(b) Fees and costs. The court shall enter an order as appropriate for costs, fees, and disbursements, including a retainer, when the attorney, guardian ad litem, or child’s representative is appointed. Any person appointed under this Section shall file with the court within 90 days of his or her appointment, and every subsequent 90 day period thereafter during the course of his or her representation, a detailed invoice for services rendered with a copy being sent to each party. The court shall review the invoice submitted and approve the fees, if they are reasonable and necessary. Any order approving the fees shall require payment by either or both parents, by any other party or source, or from the marital estate or the child’s separate estate. The court may not order payment by the Department of Healthcare and Family Services in cases in which the Department is providing child support enforcement services under Article X of the Illinois Public Aid Code. Unless otherwise ordered by the court at the time fees and costs are approved, all fees and costs payable to an attorney, guardian ad litem, or child representative under this Section are by implication deemed to be in the nature of support of the child and are within the exceptions to discharge in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C.A. 523. The provisions of Sections 501 and 508 of this Act shall apply to fees and costs for attorneys appointed under this Section.

Advertisements

“We’re close to a civil war” – Judge Haracz leads the corrupt plundering thieves in Cook County family court

with one comment


Judges like Judge Haracz in Cook County are typical of how our family court system in the U.S. is in meltdown, plundering families for their profit and to enrich child representatives, court appointed lawyers, counseling agencies, visitation supervision agencies, defaming non-custodial parents, promoting divorce, insisting on family separation and long drawn out proceedings that seriously harm the mental health of children. Judge Haracz abdicates his responsibilities and simply rubber stamps the lies of the child representatives like David Wessel and Regina Scannicchio. How do we know this. Well, we have the pleadings and reports from numerous cases, only one of which we have started to post on this blog. When we finish posting all the evidence, there will be only one thing left – IMPEACH JUDGE HARACZ – he is destroying families. Much much more to follow. Join us in protest August 12, 2011, north side of Daley Center, from 8 am to 5 pm.  Show your support for courageous parents like Linda Sacks, David Bambic, Gwendolyn Shavers, Nancy Roulfe and others by standing with us.

Follow the pending historic United States Supreme Court case addressing the abuses of Child Protecton Services in divorce cases here.

Read the United States Supreme Court petition here.

The following video says it all:

Stand Up, Speak Out, Fight Back – Against Corrupt Family Court

with one comment


PROTEST – FAMILY COURT DESTRUCTION OF FAMILIES – 

Stand together against family destruction at main Chicago area family courthouse (“ground zero”) –

Daley Center Plaza –

 August 12, 2011

For info  about Chicago area protests see this link.

MEET, PROTEST, SHARE FACTS, EDUCATE, ILLUMINATE, NAME THE CORRUPT

                IMPEACH CORRUPT JUDGES               

                          David E. Haracz

               EXPOSE CORRUPT CHILD REPRESENTATIVES          

                          David Wessel        

               CORRUPT ATTORNEYS

                         Kelly Christine Garland

CPS = DCFS (Dept of Children and Family Services)

___________________________________________________________________________

Videos about national protest being held in Flint, Michigan SAY IT ALL!!! :

STAND UP, SPEAK OUT, STRIKE BACK BY EVERY LEGAL MEANS POSSIBLE– LEARN YOUR RIGHTS AND USE THEM! NETWORK!

RISE, REBEL, MAKE A FIST, RESIST – LEARN YOUR RIGHTS AND USE THEM!  NETWORK!

 

_________________________________________________________________________________

DEMAND INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION FOR VIOLATING LAWS, DENYING DUE PROCESS, ABUSE OF OUR CHILDREN BY COURTS, FRAUD IN USE OF TITLE IV FUNDS

Judge David E. Haracz rips off parents enriches child representative David Wessel in domestic relations

with 13 comments


This link reveals evidence of criminal conduct of family court Judge David E. Haracz, Domestic Relations Division, who appears to be purposely violating Illinois statutes concerning divorce cases, in collusion with Child Representative Daved Wessel.  Judge Haracz on a pervasive and systematic basis picks the parent with the perceived greatest income, allows unsubstantiated allegations against them to stand on the record. He denies due process in that he refuses to allow a due process evidentiary hearing where witnesses  and evidence are introduced.  He tampers with records by striking responses from the accused parent. He appoints David Wessel as child representative and allows him to run his court, write orders for the parents, decide the issues, and serve as a representative of not just the children, but also the parent who is   given custody. The law specifically does not allow this. This link gives more details.

This link is an example of a motion to reconsider a final  ruling of Judge Haracz who totally denied due process and gave children to a woman who is a drug addict, borderline personality disorder, who made false unsubstantiated allegations against the father, which were unfounded by child protective services. The father now has been told he can only visit his children for one hour  per week under supervision because he is a “danger” to them, although there has been no evidence whatsoever of any dangerous behavior!

Judge David E. Haracz

We call  for a federal investigation of this “Greylord 2” scheme to rip off Title IV funds, destroy families by dragging out divorce cases, requiring unnecessary supervision of parents, allowing payment of child representatives exorbitant fees without documentation, etc.

Judge David E. Haracz should be impeached, arrested and jailed for these felony crimes.

David Wessel should be arrested for these felony crimes.

Come to national protest August 12, 2011, Daley Center Plaza and  join the protest to hold these creeps and similar corrupt judges and attorneys accountable. FOR THE CHILDREN!!

Note: CPS= child protective services. In Illinois DCFS = Dept. of Children and Family Services = CPS

Self-Immolation – Corrupt family court in every State just like in Cook County

with one comment


Two days ago Tom Ball self-immolated himself in front of a courthouse in New Hampshire, forever enshrining the motto of the State, Live Free or Die, because of a corrupt family law system which deprived him of interaction with his children and caused parental alienation and a divorce.  Our government should be seen as they are – family destroyers for profit. I am sure his children are very much worse off and suffering tremendously. If I had the money, I would set up a trust fund for them.  I hope someone will!

Follow the money and you will see how our court systems destroy our families instead of looking after the best interest of the children.  Title IV money of around $4000 plus monthly payments is given to agencies/government/court whenever a family is “supervised”. Therefore, the interests of the courts, counselors, child reps, supervisors of family visitation, etc is to make money by prolonging divorce proceedings, encouraging conflicts between parents, declaring that a parent is unfit or dangerous (even if they are not) and this also allows them to charge the parents for all these services. This along with attorneys’ fees essentially cause the family’s money to be transferred to courts, attorneys, counselors, and social service agencies. How does impoverishing the family and limiting visits to parents serve the “best interest of the children”. The incentives make sure the best interest are subservient to profit. We are wasting huge amounts of taxpayers’  dollars in the U.S. DESTROYING families, not helping children! Write your legislators – this must stop!

The New Hampshire Sentinalsource.com on line newspaper published the story and the man’s incredibly well-written suicide letter here.

The “interest of the children” clearly are ignored.  Pray for our children in Illinois who suffer the same brainwashing about a parent, suffer family financial destruction, and suffer from stress of being taken from a parent – all for profit of the court system, the mental health counselors, and the attorneys – many of whom profit from improperly used government grants.

I and others are trying to organize to change the laws and court system in Illinois because it is the same as this man describes in New Hampshire, if not worse. Please send me an e-mail at picepil@aol.com if you want to help organize.

Never Forget TOM BALL!     Pray for his children and ex-wife.

Remember this poem written by a commentator on the newspaper’s web site:

TOM BALL – FOR THE LOVE OF FAMILY (Title by Linda Shelton)

Let us never forget the 16 of June
When a man burned to death on the lawn around Noon
His tears boiling for his children three
His search for justice so that they would be free
The elite, these cowards, forced his hand to the flame
Their callous depravity never causing them shame
For they padded their wallets and their consciences wained
And their rulings by decree only increased the pain
A family of soldiers who bravely fought wars
Their honor questioned by Judges and whores
Not by me, for I know the pain of Tom Ball
Of shouting, of crying, no one hearing my call
Let us never forget the 16 of June
When a man burned to death on the lawn around Noon

By “Voice off Bobgt”

%d bloggers like this: